Kaspr Vs Datanyze : Comparaison

Derrick and Datanyze take different approaches to tech targeting. Datanyze excels at identifying technology stacks across large databases with 70,000+ software products tracked, making it ideal for broad tech-based prospecting. Derrick, however, integrates directly into Google Sheets with real-time email validation and 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, enabling faster, more personalized outreach without external platforms. While Datanyze focuses on firmographic tech intelligence, Derrick combines tech insights with verified contact data and built-in AI scoring, streamlining your entire prospecting workflow within the tools your team already uses daily.

Pricing varies significantly across the three platforms depending on your team's needs and usage patterns. Kaspr operates on a credit-based model with transparent pricing focused on contact verification, while Datanyze charges based on data access and export volume, making it pricier for large-scale prospecting. Derrick offers the most flexible pricing with rollover credits, no card required for the free tier, and plans starting at just nine dollars monthly, making it ideal for budget-conscious teams seeking comprehensive enrichment without long-term commitments or complex setup requirements.

Yes, you can replace Kaspr with Derrick for contact enrichment, but with caveats. Kaspr excels at real-time phone/email verification and LinkedIn-based prospecting, while Derrick provides broader enrichment beyond contact data, including 50+ attributes per contact, firmographic and technographic signals, and AI-driven scoring, all within a native Google Sheets workflow. Derrick also offers real-time email validation, extensive integrations, and a credits-based model with rollovers, which can streamline multi-channel enrichment at scale. If your needs include deep account profiling and intent signals alongside contact verification, Derrick complements rather than solely duplicates Kaspr’s capabilities, though some teams may still rely on Kaspr for LinkedIn-centric sourcing. For a direct comparison, Datanyze focuses on tech-stack data, while Derrick delivers more holistic enrichment tied to outreach efficiency.

Derrick differentiates itself from Kaspr through its native Google Sheets integration, eliminating manual exports and CRM switching that Kaspr requires. While Kaspr excels at phone verification, Derrick provides 50+ enrichment attributes per contact including company intelligence, real-time email validation, and built-in AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT. Unlike Kaspr's credit system, Derrick offers rollover credits monthly with no card required for free tier, making it ideal for teams seeking comprehensive enrichment without LinkedIn Navigator costs or complex integrations.

Yes, Derrick can be a strong alternative to Datanyze for firmographic data, depending on your needs. Derrick excels in multi-attribute firmographic enrichment (50+ attributes per contact or company) and offers 100% native Google Sheets integration, which simplifies workflows without CSV exports or complex setups. While Datanyze focuses on technology stacks and large-scale firmographic coverage, Derrick complements that by enabling seamless enrichment directly inside Sheets, real-time email validation for deliverability, and AI-powered scoring and segmentation. If your priority is in-depth, up-to-date firmographic detail combined with easy collaboration and lower operational friction, Derrick provides a practical, verifiable alternative, especially when you value native sheet-based workflows and ongoing credit rollovers.