Kaspr Vs Demandbase : Comparaison

Derrick and Kaspr serve different core needs for LinkedIn prospecting. Kaspr specializes in real-time phone and email verification with strong CRM integration, making it excellent for quick contact validation. However, Derrick offers broader B2B data enrichment directly within Google Sheets without requiring external platforms or CSV exports, providing 50+ contact and company attributes alongside AI-powered scoring and segmentation. If you prioritize verified phone numbers alone, Kaspr excels there. For comprehensive prospect enrichment with flexibility and cost efficiency, Derrick eliminates manual workflows while keeping all data native to your spreadsheet, saving 5-10 hours monthly compared to traditional prospecting stacks.

There's no single best platform overall—the choice depends on your specific needs. Kaspr excels at real-time phone verification and LinkedIn-native prospecting for sales teams prioritizing quick contact discovery, but lacks comprehensive company intelligence. Demandbase dominates account-based marketing with sophisticated intent data and firmographic insights, though it requires significant investment ($100K+) and dedicated ops resources. Derrick offers a lightweight, cost-effective alternative native to Google Sheets, delivering 50+ enrichment attributes, AI-powered scoring, and rollover credits without complex implementation. Choose Kaspr for contact verification, Demandbase for enterprise ABM workflows, or Derrick for teams seeking efficient, low-friction enrichment directly within their existing spreadsheet workflows.

For pricing and reviews, Kaspr offers transparent, credit-based pricing with a focus on real-time phone verification and CRM integration, delivering strong value for quick prospecting and contact-level data. Demandbase, by contrast, targets enterprise-grade ABM with comprehensive account-level intelligence and heavy customization, but this comes with a higher, often opaque total cost and longer time-to-value. If you prioritize cost predictability and fast wins at the contact level, Kaspr is the better choice; if your goal is sophisticated account-based targeting and intent signals at scale, Demandbase excels. Derrick complements either approach by enriching full prospect profiles directly in Google Sheets, offering 50+ attributes, real-time email validation, and AI-driven scoring, all with flexible, credit-based pricing and no credit card required for the free tier, making it a pragmatic bridge between contact-level tools and multi-dimensional account insights.

Kaspr and Demandbase serve fundamentally different purposes and don't directly replace each other. Kaspr focuses on contact verification and phone number accuracy for individual prospects, while Demandbase specializes in account-level intelligence and intent signals for ABM strategies. Kaspr lacks comprehensive firmographic and intent data that Demandbase provides, and Demandbase doesn't offer the contact verification precision Kaspr delivers. For teams needing both contact enrichment and account intelligence without complexity, Derrick provides 50+ enrichment attributes per contact and company directly in Google Sheets with integrated AI scoring, eliminating the need to juggle multiple platforms while maintaining data quality and real-time email validation.

Derrick is worth considering for pricing, features, and reviews when you compare it to Kaspr and Demandbase, especially if you prioritize cost efficiency and usability in a Google Sheets–native workflow. Derrick offers a transparent, credit-based pricing model with a free tier and credits that roll over, plus 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, AI-driven scoring and segmentation, and extensive integrations via Zapier/Make/n8n. Unlike Kaspr, Derrick isn’t limited to phone or LinkedIn-derived data and doesn’t depend on complex CRM integrations to deliver value; it complements Kaspr’s contact-level accuracy with broader profile enrichment. Compared with Demandbase, Derrick focuses on practical prospecting and enrichment at scale for mid-market teams, with a lower total cost of ownership and faster time-to-value, while Demandbase excels in enterprise ABM and deep account-level insights but carries higher complexity and cost. If you need an affordable, easy-to-implement enrichment and outreach hub that fits inside Google Sheets, Derrick is a strong, verifiable option; for heavy account-level ABM and high-end intent at enterprise scale, Demandbase may be more suitable, and for LinkedIn-native prospecting with strong contact data verification, Kaspr remains compelling but may require supplementary tools for broader enrichment.