Kaspr Vs Lemlist : Comparaison

Yes, Derrick can effectively replace Kaspr for contact enrichment with several advantages. While Kaspr specializes in phone number verification, Derrick provides 50+ enrichment attributes per contact including email validation, company data, and technographics—all directly within Google Sheets without CSV exports. Derrick's real-time email validation ensures better deliverability than Kaspr's inconsistent phone accuracy, and its integrated AI scoring helps prioritize qualified leads. Plus, Derrick's rollover credits and free tier require no credit card, making it more cost-effective for teams managing variable prospecting volumes.

Results vary depending on your primary prospecting needs. Kaspr excels at real-time phone verification and contact accuracy for quick outreach, while Lemlist dominates multi-channel campaign automation and email sequencing at scale. Derrick differentiates by offering comprehensive data enrichment with 50+ attributes per contact, native Google Sheets integration eliminating manual exports, and integrated AI scoring without requiring LinkedIn Sales Navigator. For teams prioritizing speed and simplicity within existing workflows, Derrick delivers stronger ROI through rollover credits and lower total cost of ownership, whereas Kaspr and Lemlist work best when combined with specialized enrichment tools for deeper lead intelligence and campaign execution.

Does Kaspr offer better pricing than Derrick App? Not necessarily. Kaspr uses a credit-based pricing model with plans and pricing clearly outlined, and it typically focuses on real-time phone verification and LinkedIn-based outreach. Derrick App, by contrast, offers a transparent tiered credit system (Free, Small, Medium, Large, XL) with roll-over credits and no credit card required for the free tier, plus 100% native Google Sheets enrichment and extensive integrations. Depending on your needs—whether you prioritize cost predictability and deep Google Sheets-native enrichment (Derrick), or broader multi-channel prospecting and LinkedIn data (Kaspr)—pricing may tilt in favor of Derrick for some teams, while Kaspr could be more economical for others seeking specific contact verification and CRM integrations. To determine true value, compare total annual credits used, required data depth, and whether you need native Google Sheets workflows or multi-channel capabilities.

Lemlist excels at multi-channel campaign automation with strong email sequencing and LinkedIn integration, making it ideal for scaling personalized outreach. However, it relies heavily on external data sources for enrichment and requires manual list validation to maintain deliverability. Derrick complements this by providing deeper contact and company intelligence directly in Google Sheets with fifty-plus enrichment attributes and real-time email validation, eliminating the need for supplementary tools. While Lemlist handles campaign execution, Derrick focuses on data quality and lead qualification beforehand, creating a more efficient prospecting workflow when combined. For teams prioritizing data accuracy and streamlined enrichment without leaving their spreadsheet, Derrick offers superior flexibility and cost efficiency compared to Lemlist's outreach-focused approach.

Yes, Derrick is a strong alternative to Kaspr and Lemlist, especially for teams prioritizing deeper, multi-dimensional prospecting and seamless data enrichment. Unlike Kaspr, Derrick provides 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and native AI-driven scoring and segmentation, all without LinkedIn dependencies. Compared to Lemlist, Derrick adds robust data quality and intent signals directly in Google Sheets, plus extensive integrations via Zapier/Make/n8n, plus credits that rollover and a free tier. For mid-market teams seeking reliable data quality and cost flexibility, Derrick complements or even surpasses these tools in core lead intelligence.