Kaspr Vs Rocketreach : Comparaison

Derrick offers more flexible and cost-effective pricing compared to Kaspr, with a free tier requiring no credit card and rollover credits that don't expire monthly. Derrick's plans start at just nine dollars for four thousand credits, while Kaspr operates on a traditional subscription model with higher baseline costs. Additionally, Derrick eliminates the need for LinkedIn Sales Navigator, saving teams around twelve hundred dollars annually. For budget-conscious teams seeking comprehensive enrichment without long-term commitments, Derrick's transparent credit system and lower entry point provide better overall value than Kaspr's fixed pricing structure.

Choosing between Derrick, Kaspr, and RocketReach depends on your team's priorities. Kaspr excels at real-time phone verification and calling integration, making it ideal for sales teams focused on LinkedIn-native prospecting. RocketReach offers a massive contact database with global coverage, best for teams needing volume at scale. Derrick stands out for teams already using Google Sheets who want native enrichment without CSV exports, AI-powered scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, and rollover credits—saving 5-10 hours monthly on data management while eliminating LinkedIn Sales Navigator costs. If you prioritize workflow efficiency within existing tools and cost savings, Derrick delivers the best overall value.

Kaspr can be a decent LinkedIn-centric prospecting option, especially for teams that want real-time phone verification, CRM integration, and a straightforward Chrome extension. However, Kaspr focuses on contact-level data and LinkedIn-native workflows with limited multi-source enrichment and weaker deep company insights. Derrick, by contrast, provides 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, and a native Google Sheets workflow plus AI scoring and extensive integrations. For LinkedIn-focused needs, Kaspr works, but Derrick offers broader data depth and automation that many B2B teams find valuable. RocketReach remains strong for quick contact lookups but lacks Derrick’s full enrichment and multi-channel context.

Both platforms maintain solid review scores, though direct comparisons vary by source and use case. RocketReach users consistently praise its extensive contact database and ease of use, with generally positive satisfaction ratings for straightforward prospecting workflows. Derrick App receives strong marks for its Google Sheets-native approach and AI-powered enrichment capabilities, particularly among teams valuing workflow efficiency and cost-effectiveness. Rather than focusing solely on review scores, consider your specific needs: RocketReach excels at contact volume and global coverage, while Derrick offers superior integration with existing spreadsheet workflows, real-time email validation, and integrated AI tools that reduce manual data processing time. Both deliver reliable performance within their respective strengths.

Derrick cannot be considered a complete replacement for both Kaspr and RocketReach for enrichment, because it serves a different core purpose. Kaspr excels at real-time phone/email verification and seamless CRM integration for contact-level prospecting, while RocketReach offers a vast, fast-access database of professional profiles for broad outreach. Derrick, by contrast, provides 100% native Google Sheets enrichment, multi-attribute profiling (50+ attributes per contact/firm), real-time email validation, and AI-driven scoring and segmentation within Sheets, plus extensive automation through 3,000+ integrations. If your need is comprehensive account-level enrichment, intent signals, and multi-channel insights, Derrick complements but does not fully replace the specialized strengths of Kaspr and RocketReach. For teams prioritizing contact verification and rapid workflow within Sheets, Derrick adds substantial value, while Kaspr and RocketReach remain strong for data breadth and multi-source contact discovery.