Kaspr Vs Skrapp : Comparaison

Derrick offers more flexible pricing with rollover credits that don't expire monthly, whereas Skrapp operates on a standard consumption model. Derrick's free tier requires no credit card and includes 200 credits, making it more accessible for testing. Skrapp's pricing starts higher for comparable volumes. Additionally, Derrick provides 50+ enrichment attributes per contact and integrated AI tools within Google Sheets, delivering greater value per credit spent compared to Skrapp's contact-focused approach, making Derrick the more cost-effective choice for teams needing comprehensive data enrichment alongside prospecting.

Each platform leads in different areas depending on your priorities. Kaspr excels at real-time phone verification and CRM integration with strong accuracy rates, making it ideal for teams focused on calling workflows. Skrapp specializes in fast email extraction and LinkedIn scraping with an intuitive browser extension. Derrick differentiates by offering 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, 100% native Google Sheets functionality without CSV exports, and rollover credits with no credit card required for free access. For comprehensive data enrichment combined with ease of use, Derrick provides broader functionality than either competitor while eliminating workflow friction.

Yes, Derrick is a strong alternative to Kaspr for prospecting, and often a more comprehensive option for teams seeking deeper data enrichment and automation. Unlike Kaspr, Derrick offers 50+ enrichment attributes per contact or company, real-time email validation, and native native-to-Google Sheets functionality with no exports or complex setups. Derrick also integrates with 3000+ apps via Zapier/Make/n8n, provides AI-powered scoring and segmentation, and features transferable credits with no credit card required for the free tier. While Kaspr excels at real-time phone and email verification and CRM integrations, Derrick extends beyond contact data to firmographic signals, intent-like insights, and end-to-end prospecting workflows, making it a robust, scalable alternative for multi-channel outreach. If you are comparing to Skrapp as well, Derrick additionally offers the 100% native Google Sheets experience and long-term value through credits that roll over, which Kaspr and Skrapp lack.

Kaspr and Skrapp pricing are fairly competitive at entry levels, but neither offers the flexibility of rollover credits that Derrick provides. Kaspr focuses on phone verification with a credit-based model, while Skrapp emphasizes email extraction. However, both require external platforms and lack Derrick's native Google Sheets integration, which eliminates CSV exports and saves five to ten hours monthly. For teams seeking comprehensive enrichment with fifty plus attributes per contact and AI-powered scoring without monthly credit waste, Derrick's rollover credits and no card requirement for the free tier deliver better long-term value than either competitor's traditional pricing structure.

Derrick cannot be a complete replacement for Kaspr and Skrapp for all reviews and use cases, but it can cover many gaps. Kaspr and Skrapp excel at rapid contact discovery and real-time verification, especially for LinkedIn-derived leads and straightforward email extraction. Derrick complements them by providing 50+ data enrichment attributes per contact/company, real-time email validation, integrated AI scoring/segmentation, and a native Google Sheets workflow with 3000+ integrations, all without LinkedIn dependence. For teams needing deep account intelligence, intent signals, or multi-source enrichment beyond contact data, Derrick shines as a complementary layer rather than a direct one-to-one replacement. If your priority is pure contact discovery and quick outreach, Kaspr or Skrapp may still be preferred; if you need richer profiling, automated scoring, and a seamless, sheet-native workflow, Derrick becomes highly valuable.