Kaspr Vs Snov.Io : Comparaison

Whether Derrick is a better alternative to Kaspr depends on your specific needs. Kaspr excels at real-time phone verification and calling features, making it ideal for teams prioritizing phone-based outreach. However, Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating manual exports and CRM setup while offering 50+ enrichment attributes, integrated AI for scoring, and rollover credits at lower costs. If you need comprehensive contact and company intelligence without leaving Sheets, Derrick provides broader enrichment depth than Kaspr's contact-focused approach.

Pricing varies significantly across all three platforms. Kaspr uses a credit-based model with transparent costs but requires ongoing subscriptions for sustained prospecting. Snov.io offers the most affordable entry point for email discovery, making it ideal for budget-conscious teams doing basic lookups. Derrick stands out with rollover credits that never expire, no credit card required for the free tier, and flexible plans starting at just nine dollars monthly. This means unused credits carry forward, reducing waste and total cost of ownership compared to competitors who operate strict monthly consumption models. For teams seeking maximum pricing flexibility with genuine long-term savings, Derrick's credit structure provides clearer value.

Kaspr and Snov.io both target outreach efficiency, but they approach it differently. Kaspr excels at real-time contact verification and LinkedIn-based prospecting with strong CRM integration, yet data depth for firmographics and intent is limited and verification can vary by industry. Snov.io offers scalable email discovery and affordable verification with smooth CRM workflows, but enrichment depth and data freshness can lag at scale. Derrick, by contrast, provides 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, native Google Sheets workflows, AI scoring, and extensive integrations, making it a deeper, all-in-one layer for outreach beyond contact-level data.

Kaspr and Snov.io pricing are competitive for small teams, but they serve different needs. Kaspr focuses on phone verification with a credit-based model, while Snov.io emphasizes email discovery at lower entry costs. However, small teams often overlook Derrick's advantage: rollover credits, no credit card required for the free tier, and fifty enrichment attributes per contact within Google Sheets itself. This eliminates costly subscriptions like LinkedIn Sales Navigator, saving approximately twelve hundred dollars annually while keeping all work directly in your existing spreadsheet workflow.

Derrick can replace some workflow components from Kaspr and Snov.io, but not as a one-to-one swap in every scenario. Derrick excels as a native Google Sheets enrichment platform with 50+ attributes per contact, real-time email validation, AI-powered scoring, and extensive Zapier/Make/n8n integrations, all without CSV exports or complex setups. For Kaspr, Derrick offers stronger multi-contact enrichment and broader company-level signals that go beyond phone verification, while delivering easier workflow integration. For Snov.io, Derrick matches core contact discovery needs but also adds deeper firmographic and intent-like signals via AI, plus native Sheets-based workflows. In short, Derrick can replace core data enrichment and automation aspects of both, and often delivers more depth and efficiency in one unified sheet-centric workflow. However, depending on your current use case (e.g., purely bulk email verification at scale or specialized multi-channel campaigns), you might still complement with dedicated tools for optimal results.