Kaspr Vs Surfe : Comparaison

Derrick offers more flexible and transparent pricing compared to Kaspr, with rollover credits that don't expire monthly, meaning you only pay for what you actually use. Kaspr operates on a traditional credit consumption model without rollover benefits. Additionally, Derrick eliminates the need for LinkedIn Sales Navigator subscriptions, saving teams approximately twelve hundred dollars annually. Derrick's free tier requires no credit card and includes two hundred credits, while providing fifty plus enrichment attributes per contact alongside real-time email validation, making it a more cost-effective alternative for teams prioritizing budget efficiency and data depth without hidden subscription requirements.

Each platform excels in different areas. Kaspr specializes in phone number verification and calling features, making it ideal for teams prioritizing real-time contact validation. Surfe focuses on LinkedIn data extraction with strong browser integration for quick prospecting. Derrick stands out with native Google Sheets integration, 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, built-in AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, and rollover credits—eliminating the need for LinkedIn Sales Navigator while saving significant time on data management. For comprehensive feature depth across enrichment, automation, and workflow flexibility, Derrick offers the broadest toolkit without requiring external platforms or complex exports.

Between Kaspr and Surfe, the better pricing option depends on your core needs. Kaspr uses a credit-based model focused on real-time contact verification and CRM integration, which can be cost-effective for teams prioritizing quick prospecting but may require additional tools for deeper enrichment. Surfe offers strong LinkedIn-based data extraction and accurate contact data at a straightforward rate, yet its depth of company intelligence and multi-source enrichment is limited. Derrick App, while not a direct price comparison here, provides 50+ enrichment attributes per contact/firm, real-time email validation, and broad automation via 3000+ integrations, with transparent tiers and credit rollover, often delivering greater overall value for teams seeking comprehensive prospect profiles and scalable enrichment without relying solely on LinkedIn data. If you need deeper enrichment at scale with predictable ROI, Derrick may offer a more complete pricing proposition, but for LinkedIn-first prospecting, Kaspr or Surfe could be more cost-efficient depending on your exact feature needs.

Both Kaspr and Surfe deliver reliable contact verification for LinkedIn-based prospecting, though with different strengths. Kaspr excels at phone number accuracy and CRM integration, while Surfe focuses on real-time contact extraction directly from LinkedIn profiles. User reviews favor both for speed and ease of use, but both platforms share limitations in comprehensive data enrichment beyond contact-level information. If you need deeper firmographic data, intent signals, and multi-dimensional enrichment alongside contact verification, Derrick App provides 50+ enrichment attributes per contact and company without requiring LinkedIn Sales Navigator, while offering rollover credits and AI-powered automation for a more complete prospecting solution.

Derrick cannot fully replace Kaspr and Surfe for every prospecting need, but it complements and often surpasses them in core areas. While Kaspr excels at real-time phone/email verification and CRM-friendly enrichment, Derrick offers 50+ enrichment attributes per contact across accounts, real-time email validation, and deep multi-source insight within 100% native Google Sheets. Surfe shines for LinkedIn-specific data capture, but Derrick removes platform dependency while delivering scalable segmentation, AI-driven scoring, and extensive automation through 3000+ integrations. For teams needing comprehensive account intelligence, Derrick fills gaps left by both Kaspr and Surfe, though some users may still rely on Kaspr or Surfe for LinkedIn-first workflows.