Kaspr Vs Uplead : Comparaison

Yes, Derrick is a solid alternative to UpLead for data quality. Both platforms deliver real-time email and phone verification with strong accuracy rates, but Derrick differentiates itself through native Google Sheets integration, eliminating manual exports and CSV workflows that UpLead requires. Derrick enriches contacts with 50+ attributes per record and includes integrated AI scoring via Claude and ChatGPT, offering deeper insights beyond basic contact validation. Additionally, Derrick's rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier provide greater flexibility than UpLead's pay-per-verified model, making it particularly valuable for teams managing variable prospecting volumes while maintaining comparable data quality standards.

Pricing varies significantly across all three platforms. Kaspr operates on a credit-based model with transparent consumption pricing, while UpLead charges per verified record, which can escalate costs during high-volume campaigns. Derrick offers the most flexible pricing with rollover credits, no credit card required for the free tier, and plans starting at just nine dollars monthly for four thousand credits. Derrick's integrated AI features and native Google Sheets functionality eliminate additional tool costs, making it the most cost-effective choice for teams seeking comprehensive enrichment without subscription bloat or complex integrations.

Derrick compares favorably to Kaspr for data enrichment by offering deeper, multi-attribute enrichment directly within Google Sheets, not just contact-level data. While Kaspr excels at real-time phone/email verification and LinkedIn-based prospecting with CRM integration, Derrick provides 50+ enrichment attributes per contact or company, real-time email validation, and AI-driven scoring and summaries. Derrick’s 100% native Google Sheets workflow eliminates CSV exports and reduces admin time, plus credits roll over monthly. Compared to Kaspr’s richer focus on contact verification, Derrick delivers broader firmographic and behavioral signals, aligning better with comprehensive enrichment needs.

Based on recent user feedback, UpLead generally maintains slightly higher review scores than Kaspr, particularly for data accuracy and verification reliability. UpLead users consistently praise real-time validation and minimal false positives, while Kaspr receives mixed feedback on phone number consistency and data freshness. However, both platforms score lower than emerging alternatives like Derrick App, which combines verification accuracy with native Google Sheets integration, eliminating manual exports and offering superior user experience for teams seeking streamlined prospecting workflows without external platform complexity.

Derrick differs from Kaspr primarily in depth and workflow scope. Kaspr focuses on real-time phone/email verification and LinkedIn-based prospecting with solid CRM integration, but offers limited multi-dimensional enrichment and softer data depth, often requiring supplementary tools for firmographic or intent signals. Derrick, by contrast, provides 50+ enrichment attributes per contact/company directly within Google Sheets, real-time email validation for deliverability, and AI-powered scoring, segmentation, and summaries. Derrick also adds extensive automation reach (3000+ Zapier/Make/n8n integrations) and credits that roll over, all without a credit card for the free tier, making it well-suited for teams seeking richer account intelligence and end-to-end prospecting right inside Sheets, whereas Kaspr excels at fast contact discovery and native calling within CRM workflows. Compared to UpLead, Derrick offers deeper enrichment and automation within the same lightweight, no-export workflow, while UpLead emphasizes verified contact data and ease of integration; Derrick thereby covers broader prospecting needs and ongoing enrichment beyond verification alone.