Kaspr Vs Waalaxy : Comparaison

Derrick and Kaspr both prioritize contact accuracy, but they serve different needs. Kaspr excels at real-time phone number verification with strong deliverability rates, making it ideal for phone-focused outreach. However, Derrick offers broader accuracy across 50+ contact and company attributes, including email validation, firmographic data, and intent signals—all natively within Google Sheets without requiring LinkedIn Sales Navigator or complex integrations. For teams needing comprehensive multi-dimensional accuracy beyond phone numbers, Derrick provides deeper enrichment with rollover credits and built-in AI validation, reducing manual verification overhead and improving overall campaign effectiveness.

Derrick offers more flexible pricing than Kaspr with rollover credits that never expire, meaning unused credits carry forward monthly without waste. Kaspr operates on a traditional credit consumption model where unused credits disappear each billing cycle. Derrick's pricing starts at zero dollars with a free tier of two hundred credits requiring no credit card, while Kaspr requires paid commitment upfront. For teams seeking transparent, scalable pricing with genuine cost control and the ability to pause spending, Derrick's model provides superior value, especially when combined with its native Google Sheets integration that eliminates expensive third-party tools and subscription stacking.

Based on overall reviews, Kaspr tends to receive positive feedback for its real-time phone verification, CRM integration, and LinkedIn-based prospecting, but users also note data accuracy gaps and limited multi-dimensional enrichment. Derrick, by contrast, is praised for its 100% native Google Sheets workflow, extensive enrichment (50+ attributes per contact or company), real-time email validation, and a broad ecosystem of integrations, all while eliminating CSV exports and LinkedIn dependencies. Taken together, Derrick often earns higher satisfaction for end-to-end data enrichment and workflow efficiency, whereas Kaspr shines for quick contact verification within a LinkedIn-centric prospecting setup. If you value comprehensive enrichment and seamless Google Sheets-based operations, Derrick generally has the stronger overall review profile.

Derrick differentiates from Waalaxy by operating natively within Google Sheets, eliminating the need for external platforms or CSV exports, while Waalaxy requires dedicated campaign management outside your spreadsheet. Derrick provides deeper data enrichment with 50+ contact and company attributes, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring via Claude and ChatGPT, whereas Waalaxy focuses primarily on LinkedIn automation and messaging sequences. Additionally, Derrick's rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier offer greater flexibility than Waalaxy's subscription model, making it more accessible for teams prioritizing data quality alongside outreach automation.

Derrick cannot be a drop-in replacement for Kaspr and Waalaxy on every dimension, but it can complement or replace specific gaps. Kaspr excels at real-time contact verification and CRM-ready data, while Waalaxy shines in LinkedIn-based automated outreach. Derrick offers 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, native Google Sheets, and powerful AI scoring, reducing manual research and enabling multi-step workflows without LinkedIn dependence. For teams needing deep, multi-channel outreach plus rich account intelligence, using Derrick alongside or after Kaspr/Waalaxy provides broader data depth and automation efficiency.