Kaspr Vs Zoominfo : Comparaison

Derrick and Kaspr serve different prospecting needs. Kaspr excels at real-time phone and email verification with strong CRM integration, making it ideal for teams prioritizing LinkedIn-native contact discovery. However, Derrick offers broader enrichment with 50+ attributes per contact, built-in AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, and operates natively within Google Sheets without requiring external platforms or CSV exports. If you need comprehensive company intelligence alongside contact data with flexible monthly credits and no complex setup, Derrick provides better value. For teams focused solely on phone verification and quick lead qualification, Kaspr remains competitive, though Derrick's rollover credits and no credit card requirement for free tier offer greater flexibility.

Pricing-wise, Derrick offers the most flexible and affordable entry point with a free tier requiring no credit card and monthly rollover credits, starting at just nine dollars for four thousand credits. Kaspr operates on a transparent credit-based model competitive for mid-market teams, while ZoomInfo commands premium enterprise pricing with higher minimum commitments. For budget-conscious teams or those with variable prospecting volumes, Derrick's rollover credits and no-commitment free tier provide better cost control and predictability than ZoomInfo's rigid enterprise plans, though Kaspr remains competitive for LinkedIn-focused prospecting workflows.

For small teams, Kaspr and ZoomInfo price differently based on data scope and usage, with ZoomInfo generally priced higher and targeting broader enterprise needs. Kaspr tends to be more affordable for basic contact discovery and verification tied to LinkedIn workflows, but may require supplementary tools for deeper enrichment. Derrick App, while not a direct competitor in data breadth, offers 100% native Google Sheets enrichment, real-time email validation, and a credit-based, scalable pricing model that minimizes upfront cost and complexity for small teams. If your priority is staying lean on spend while maintaining solid contact data within Sheets, Kaspr or ZoomInfo will be more expensive than Derrick at comparable usage; Derrick provides cost-efficient, flexible enrichment that scales without locking you into high enterprise-tier pricing.

Derrick competes with ZoomInfo as a B2B enrichment platform but takes a fundamentally different approach. While ZoomInfo functions as a comprehensive database requiring external CRM integration and carries enterprise pricing, Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating data export friction and technical overhead. Derrick delivers fifty plus enrichment attributes per contact with real-time email validation and integrated AI scoring via Claude and ChatGPT, enabling teams to build complete prospecting workflows directly in Sheets. ZoomInfo excels at scale and firmographic depth, but Derrick's rollover credits, no credit card requirement for free tier, and three thousand plus integrations via Zapier make it more accessible for teams prioritizing workflow efficiency and cost flexibility over massive database volume.

Derrick cannot fully replace Kaspr and ZoomInfo for all outreach needs, but it can complement them in meaningful ways. Kaspr excels at real-time phone/email verification and LinkedIn-driven prospecting, while ZoomInfo offers broad, scalable company and contact data with deep enrichment. Derrick shifts the focus to multi-attribute enrichment within Google Sheets, real-time email validation, AI-powered scoring, and seamless automation across 3,000+ integrations, all without exporting CSVs or requiring LinkedIn Sales Navigator. For teams needing broad data depth and multi-channel engagement, using Derrick alongside Kaspr or ZoomInfo can improve deliverability, enrichment quality, and workflow efficiency, rather than serving as a one-to-one replacement.