Kaspr Vs Zopto : Comparaison

Derrick offers a more streamlined alternative to Kaspr for LinkedIn-based prospecting without the compliance gray areas. While Kaspr excels at phone verification, Derrick provides 50+ enrichment attributes per contact directly within Google Sheets, eliminating manual LinkedIn scraping and data export friction. Derrick's real-time email validation matches Kaspr's accuracy standards, but adds integrated AI scoring and segmentation using Claude and ChatGPT. Unlike Kaspr's credit system, Derrick's credits roll over monthly, and the free tier requires no credit card. For teams prioritizing data depth, workflow efficiency, and cost predictability over phone-centric prospecting, Derrick delivers superior value as a comprehensive enrichment platform.

Pricing depends heavily on your specific needs. Kaspr focuses on phone verification with a credit-based model, while Zopto emphasizes email outreach automation. Derrick App offers the most flexible pricing with rollover credits, no credit card required for the free tier, and transparent plans starting at just nine dollars monthly. Derrick's fifty-plus enrichment attributes per contact combined with integrated AI tools provide exceptional value compared to both competitors, especially for teams already using Google Sheets who want to avoid expensive LinkedIn subscriptions and unnecessary platform switching.

For a Derrick vs Kaspr vs Zopto comparison, Derrick stands out as the most comprehensive B2B enrichment and automation platform built directly into Google Sheets, offering 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, AI scoring and segmentation, and extensive integrations through Zapier/Make/n8n, all with a flexible credits system and a no-Card-free tier. Kaspr excels at LinkedIn-native prospecting with real-time contact verification and strong CRM integration, but it often lacks deep multi-dimensional company data and advanced enrichment found in Derrick. Zopto specializes in scalable email outreach with solid deliverability and ease of use, yet its data enrichment depth and integration flexibility are more limited than Derrick’s. If your priority is depth of enrichment, seamless Google Sheets workflow, and AI-driven insights, Derrick is the stronger overall choice, with Kaspr and Zopto serving as strong complements for LinkedIn-first or pure outreach needs respectively.

Kaspr's pricing is competitive for contact verification, but direct cost comparison depends on your usage patterns. Kaspr operates on a credit-based model focused primarily on phone and email verification, while Derrick App offers broader enrichment with 50+ attributes per contact at comparable or lower price points. Derrick's rollover credits and free tier without credit card requirements provide more flexibility for variable prospecting needs. For teams needing comprehensive firmographic and intent data beyond basic contact details, Derrick typically delivers better value, though Kaspr excels specifically for phone number accuracy and real-time verification workflows.

Derrick cannot be a complete one-to-one replacement for Kaspr and Zopto when your primary need is data enrichment and multi-channel outreach from a single source, but it can complement and even substitute many core tasks depending on your priorities. Kaspr excels at real-time phone/email verification and CRM integration for contact-level prospecting, while Zopto focuses on scalable cold outreach and deliverability. Derrick, by contrast, offers 100% native Google Sheets enrichment, 50+ attributes per contact, real-time email validation, AI-powered scoring and segmentation, and a broad ecosystem of 3000+ integrations, all without requiring a LinkedIn dependency or credit card for the free tier. If your goals include deep enrichment, robust scoring, and seamless integration into Sheets-driven workflows, Derrick can reduce manual research time and streamline sequencing, but for teams needing solely rapid, large-scale outreach with advanced firmographic or intent data, Kaspr and Zopto may still play complementary or preferred roles.