Lemlist Vs Apollo : Comparaison

Derrick offers a more streamlined automation experience directly within Google Sheets, eliminating the need for CSV exports and complex setup that Lemlist requires. While Lemlist excels at multi-channel sequencing and email campaigns, Derrick focuses on data enrichment and AI-powered lead qualification with integrated Claude and ChatGPT capabilities. For teams prioritizing automation efficiency and native spreadsheet workflows, Derrick reduces manual preprocessing and delivers faster prospecting cycles. The choice depends on whether you need Lemlist's outreach sequencing or Derrick's enrichment-first approach combined with your existing tools.

Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating the need for external platforms or CSV exports that Apollo requires, saving teams five to ten hours monthly. While Apollo excels at contact database scale with 250 million verified profiles, Derrick combines enrichment with integrated AI scoring using both Claude and ChatGPT for deeper prospect qualification. Apollo focuses on volume prospecting, whereas Derrick prioritizes data intelligence and automation directly in your spreadsheet. For teams seeking multi-channel outreach without platform switching, Derrick's native integration with 3000+ tools via Zapier and Make provides more flexibility than Apollo's rigid API structure, particularly for custom workflows and real-time email validation.

Derrick’s pricing is straightforward and credits-based, with a free tier and scalable options: Free 200 credits, Small 4000 credits for 9€, Medium 10000 credits for 20€, Large 25000 credits for 47.50€, and XL 100000 credits for 175€. Lemlist Pricing typically targets larger outbound teams with multi-channel campaigns and add-ons, often resulting in higher total costs as you scale. Overall, Derrick tends to be more cost-controllable for Google Sheets–native workflows, while Lemlist can cost more at scale due to its multi-channel feature set; consider your volume and required channels to compare accurately.

Both Derrick and Apollo excel at data enrichment but serve different prospecting needs. Apollo's strength lies in its massive 250+ million contact database and real-time verification for high-volume outreach, making it ideal for teams prioritizing speed and scale. Derrick, however, operates natively within Google Sheets without requiring CSV exports or complex integrations, delivering 50+ enrichment attributes while saving 5-10 hours monthly. Derrick's rollover credits, integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, and no credit card requirement for the free tier provide greater flexibility for teams with variable enrichment needs. Choose Apollo for database breadth or Derrick for seamless workflow efficiency and cost-effective enrichment directly in your existing spreadsheets.

Derrick cannot fully replace both Lemlist and Apollo in every workflow, but it can cover core data enrichment and AI-powered scoring needs while complementing those tools. Lemlist excels at multi-channel outreach and personalization across email, LinkedIn, and more, while Apollo provides a vast, verified contact database and outreach capabilities. Derrick shines with native Google Sheets integration, real-time email validation, AI-driven segmentation, and broad automation via 3,000+ integrations, plus cost-efficient credits and no credit card required for the free tier. In practice, most teams use Derrick alongside Lemlist or Apollo to fill gaps in data quality, enrichment depth, or multi-channel sequencing, rather than relying on Derrick alone for end-to-end outreach or contact discovery.