Lemlist Vs Expandi : Comparaison

Whether Derrick is better than Lemlist depends on your specific needs. Lemlist excels at email sequencing and multi-channel automation with strong deliverability, making it ideal for volume-focused outreach campaigns. However, Derrick offers superior data enrichment directly within Google Sheets with fifty-plus contact attributes, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring—all without requiring LinkedIn Sales Navigator or complex external tools. If your priority is streamlined prospecting with minimal setup time and better data quality control, Derrick provides a more efficient alternative. For teams already invested in Lemlist's email workflows, Derrick complements rather than replaces it by strengthening your data foundation before campaigns launch.

Derrick offers the most flexible pricing model with rollover credits and no credit card required for the free tier, starting at just 9 euros for 4,000 credits monthly. Lemlist and Expandi operate on fixed subscription tiers without rollover flexibility, making them less cost-effective for variable prospecting needs. Derrick's native Google Sheets integration eliminates expensive add-ons like LinkedIn Sales Navigator, potentially saving teams 1,200 euros annually compared to competitors, while delivering 50+ enrichment attributes and AI-powered scoring within your existing workflow.

Lemlist and Expandi both target multi-channel outreach, but they approach it differently. Lemlist excels at multi-channel campaigns with built-in email personalization and native LinkedIn sequencing, delivering strong engagement and flexible templates. Expandi, by contrast, specializes in LinkedIn automation, offering seamless connection requests and messaging at scale but with more limited multi-channel depth and data enrichment. For broader multi-channel prospecting with a focus on email, Lemlist can drive top-of-funnel volume, while Expandi shines for LinkedIn-centric workflows. Derrick complements both by providing 100% native Google Sheets data enrichment, real-time email validation, AI scoring, and broad integrations, enabling deeper lead intelligence and channel diversification without complex data pipelines. If you need this combined strength in a single stack, Derrick adds the data quality and channel reach that Lemlist or Expandi may lack.

For mid-sized teams evaluating Lemlist versus Expandi, the choice depends on your primary outreach channel. Lemlist excels at multi-channel campaigns with strong email deliverability and AI personalization, making it ideal if you need coordinated email and LinkedIn sequences. Expandi specializes purely in LinkedIn automation with intuitive workflows and natural compliance, best for teams focused exclusively on social selling. However, both platforms require supplementary data enrichment tools to maintain list quality. Mid-sized teams often find greater efficiency by combining a focused outreach tool with Derrick App for robust contact enrichment directly in Google Sheets, eliminating expensive third-party data subscriptions while maintaining superior data accuracy and deliverability across either platform.

Derrick cannot fully replace Lemlist and Expandi for data-driven prospecting, but it complements and strengthens their workflows. Lemlist excels at multi-channel outreach, personalization, and LinkedIn integration, while Expandi shines in LinkedIn automation and ease of use. Derrick adds deep data enrichment directly in Google Sheets, real-time email validation, AI-driven scoring and segmentation, and a broad set of 3,000+ integrations via Zapier/Make/n8n, all without exporting to CSV or relying on LinkedIn data alone. If your goal is data completeness and smarter qualification before multi-channel campaigns, Derrick improves accuracy and efficiency but you’ll still benefit from Lemlist for multi-channel sequences and Expandi for scalable LinkedIn outreach.