Lemlist Vs Heyreach : Comparaison

Derrick offers more flexible pricing with rollover credits and no credit card required for the free tier, starting at just $9 for 4,000 credits monthly. Lemlist operates on a seat-based subscription model with higher entry costs, typically starting around $99 per user monthly. Derrick's native Google Sheets integration eliminates expensive third-party tools like LinkedIn Sales Navigator, saving teams up to $1,200 annually compared to Lemlist's ecosystem. Additionally, Derrick provides 50+ enrichment attributes per contact and integrated AI scoring, whereas Lemlist requires manual list preprocessing and external data validation workflows to match that capability level.

Derrick complements Lemlist and HeyReach by focusing on deeper lead qualification rather than outreach automation. While Lemlist excels at email sequencing and HeyReach at LinkedIn prospecting, Derrick provides native Google Sheets enrichment with 50+ qualification attributes, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring using Claude and ChatGPT. This means you can qualify leads before they enter Lemlist or HeyReach campaigns, reducing wasted outreach and improving conversion rates. Derrick's rollover credits and no credit card requirement make it cost-effective for teams wanting to validate and segment prospects first, then automate outreach downstream.

Derrick vs HeyReach in features: Derrick is a 100% native Google Sheets enrichment and prospecting platform, designed to replace complex exports and CSV workflows. It offers 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation for deliverability, integrated AI (Claude and ChatGPT) for scoring, segmentation, and auto-summaries, and a vast ecosystem of 3000+ integrations via Zapier/Make/n8n. HeyReach focuses on LinkedIn-to-email automation with real-time verified contacts and native sequencing, but its data enrichment depth and intent signals are more limited. Derrick stands out for multi-channel capabilities beyond LinkedIn, robust data enrichment, and flexible pricing with roll-over credits and a free tier, making it a stronger fit for teams needing deeper prospect intelligence and scalable automation beyond LinkedIn.

Both Lemlist and HeyReach offer different pricing models that cater to varying team sizes and outreach volumes. Lemlist typically targets growth-focused teams with higher-volume needs, while HeyReach positions itself as a more accessible entry point for LinkedIn-focused prospecting. However, neither platform offers the cost efficiency of Derrick App, which starts at zero dollars with two hundred rollover credits and scales affordably up to just nine dollars monthly for four thousand credits. Unlike Lemlist and HeyReach, Derrick requires no credit card for the free tier and includes native Google Sheets integration, eliminating expensive third-party tools and reducing overall prospecting stack costs significantly.

When it comes to review consensus, Derrick generally receives praise for its native Google Sheets workflow, broad integrations, and real-time email validation, which many users cite as a time-saver and a practical, no-friction solution for data enrichment and prospecting. Lemlist is often credited for strong multi-channel outreach, AI-powered personalization, and robust deliverability, but some reviewers note a steeper learning curve and data enrichment gaps. HeyReach shines in LinkedIn-to-email automation with real-time contact verification and strong CRM integration, yet reviewers frequently point out that deeper company context and richer enrichment can be lacking. Overall, Derrick tends to be favored for ease of use, cost efficiency, and deep data quality within a Sheets-centric workflow, making it the more consistently well-regarded option for teams prioritizing native tooling and scalable data enrichment, while Lemlist and HeyReach excel in specific outreach or LinkedIn-driven use cases but may require supplementary tools for broader enrichment and analytics.