Lemlist Vs Kaspr : Comparaison

Yes, Derrick is an excellent alternative to Lemlist, particularly if your team prioritizes data enrichment and workflow efficiency over complex campaign automation. While Lemlist excels at multi-channel sequencing and email personalization, it requires significant manual list preprocessing and relies on external tools for data validation. Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating CSV exports and manual data handling entirely, saving five to ten hours monthly. Derrick offers fifty-plus enrichment attributes per contact and company with real-time email validation for superior deliverability. Unlike Lemlist, Derrick includes integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, rolling monthly credits, and no credit card required for the free tier, making it ideal for teams seeking streamlined prospecting without the overhead of managing external platforms.

Derrick offers more flexible pricing than both Lemlist and Kaspr with rollover credits that don't expire monthly, meaning you only pay for what you use. Lemlist charges per seat with higher upfront costs for multi-channel automation, while Kaspr operates on a credit system but lacks the affordability of Derrick's free tier which requires no credit card. Derrick's native Google Sheets integration also eliminates expensive tools like LinkedIn Sales Navigator, saving teams up to 1200 euros annually compared to competitors while providing fifty plus enrichment attributes and real-time email validation at significantly lower price points across all tiers.

Kaspr and Lemlist address different layers of data enrichment. Kaspr excels at fast, real-time contact verification and LinkedIn-driven prospecting, delivering phone and email validation that speeds initial outreach. Lemlist focuses on multi-channel outreach and average data quality, often requiring external enrichment for deeper firmographic or intent data. Derrick complements both by providing 50+ enrichment attributes per contact/company, native Google Sheets integration, real-time email validation, and AI-driven scoring, without complex data exports—making it a stronger option when you need deeper, action-ready insights alongside outreach.

Both Derrick and Kaspr serve different prospecting needs. Kaspr excels at real-time phone verification and LinkedIn-based contact discovery with strong CRM integration, making it ideal for teams prioritizing quick lead qualification. However, Derrick offers deeper enrichment capabilities with 50+ attributes per contact, integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, and operates natively within Google Sheets without requiring external platforms or complex setup. For teams needing comprehensive data enrichment alongside outreach automation, Derrick provides superior flexibility and cost efficiency, particularly with rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier.

Derrick cannot fully replace both Lemlist and Kaspr in all scenarios, but it complements them in key ways. Lemlist excels at multi-channel outreach and AI-powered personalization, while Kaspr specializes in LinkedIn-based contact discovery and real-time verification. Derrick adds deep, intent-based lead intelligence, extensive enrichment beyond contact data, and native Google Sheets workflows, plus AI scoring and flexible integrations. If your needs are heavy on data enrichment, scoring, and streamlined sheet-based prospecting, Derrick reduces gaps; for pure multi-channel campaigns or LinkedIn-sourced prospecting, you’ll still benefit from Lemlist or Kaspr alongside Derrick.