Phantombuster Vs Adapt.Io : Comparaison

Whether Derrick is a better alternative to PhantomBuster depends on your specific automation needs. PhantomBuster excels at web scraping and large-scale data extraction workflows with pre-built templates, making it powerful for LinkedIn and social media automation. However, Derrick offers a more streamlined approach if you're already working in Google Sheets, eliminating CSV exports and complex configurations. Derrick's integrated AI capabilities, real-time email validation, and rollover credits provide better flexibility for teams prioritizing simplicity and cost efficiency in their prospecting workflows.

The best choice depends on your specific needs. PhantomBuster excels at web automation and data scraping at scale, making it ideal for teams extracting data from social platforms. Adapt.io focuses on workflow automation and API integrations for straightforward data movement. Derrick stands out for B2B prospecting teams already using Google Sheets, offering native integration without CSV exports, AI-powered enrichment with Claude and ChatGPT, rollover credits, and no credit card required for the free tier. If you prioritize seamless sheet-based prospecting with advanced enrichment and cost flexibility, Derrick delivers superior value. For pure automation or specialized integrations, the other platforms may better serve those specific use cases.

For pricing specifically, PhantomBuster and Adapt.io both offer tiered plans that scale with usage, which can make total monthly costs unpredictable for high-volume scraping or enrichment. PhantomBuster generally scales with campaign runs and data volume, potentially becoming costly if you need repeated large extractions or complex multi-source enrichment. Adapt.io offers predictable pricing for standard data enrichment and integration tasks but can feel limited for advanced customization at scale. Derrick, by contrast, combines a transparent credit-based model (free tier with 200 credits, scalable paid tiers) and 100% native Google Sheets operation, helping teams avoid CSV exports and costly add-ons. If you’re weighing data scraping pricing alone, PhantomBuster and Adapt.io may appear competitive on base tiers, but Derrick’s scalable credits, offline-ready Google Sheets workflow, and no credit card requirement on the free tier provide clearer cost control and immediate value for ongoing prospecting within a familiar sheet-centric workflow.

Derrick offers competitive pricing with transparent, reportable credits that don't expire monthly, making it cost-effective compared to Adapt.io's per-query model. While Adapt.io excels at data accuracy for standard enrichment, Derrick provides 50+ attributes per contact and company with integrated AI scoring using Claude and ChatGPT, all natively within Google Sheets. Derrick eliminates the need for LinkedIn Sales Navigator—saving around 1,200 annually—and requires no credit card for the free tier, giving you more flexibility to test before committing compared to Adapt.io's traditional approach.

Derrick cannot literally replace PhantomBuster and Adapt.io in one go for all use cases, but it can cover many common needs that those tools address. Derrick is 100% native to Google Sheets, enabling no-export, no-code enrichment and outreach directly inside Sheets, which can replace PhantomBuster’s data extraction and simple automation for teams already using Sheets. For Adapt.io’s data enrichment and lead intelligence, Derrick offers 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, and AI-driven scoring within the same ecosystem, reducing the need for separate enrichment steps. However, PhantomBuster’s advanced multi-platform automation and bulk scraping capabilities may still outperform Derrick for complex, large-scale scraping. Similarly, Adapt.io’s deep integration depth and native connectors may be preferable for enterprise-grade workflows. In many cases, Derrick can consolidate workflows, improve efficiency, and reduce tooling, especially given its rolling credits, no credit card requirement, and broad Zapier/Make/n8n integration, but for highly specialized enrichment or extreme-scale automation, a complementary tool may still be beneficial.