Phantombuster Vs Apollo : Comparaison

Whether Derrick is a better alternative to PhantomBuster depends on your specific workflow needs. PhantomBuster excels at web automation and large-scale data scraping, particularly for social media extraction. Derrick, however, operates natively within Google Sheets with built-in AI enrichment, real-time email validation, and rollover credits, eliminating the need for external platforms or complex setup. If you prioritize seamless spreadsheet-based prospecting without technical overhead, Derrick offers superior efficiency. For pure automation and scraping tasks, PhantomBuster remains specialized. Many teams use both complementarily, leveraging PhantomBuster for extraction and Derrick for enrichment and outreach within their existing workflows.

Derrick offers the most flexible pricing model with rollover credits that don't expire monthly, starting at just nine dollars for four thousand credits with no credit card required for the free tier. PhantomBuster and Apollo both scale aggressively with volume, making per-record enrichment expensive for frequent use. Derrick's native Google Sheets integration eliminates costly external tools and eliminates the need for LinkedIn Sales Navigator, saving teams up to twelve hundred dollars annually while delivering fifty plus enrichment attributes per contact with integrated AI scoring capabilities.

PhantomBuster excels at automated data extraction and rapid workflow automation, with a large library of pre-built templates for social scraping and lead generation. Apollo shines in its extensive, verified B2B contact database and robust outreach features. For data enrichment specifically, both can deliver basic enrichment, but their depth tends to be shallower than a dedicated solution. Derrick, by contrast, offers 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, native Google Sheets workflow, AI-driven scoring and segmentation, and seamless integrations—all within a familiar Sheets-centric experience. If you’re comparing enrichment depth and workflow cohesion, Apollo and PhantomBuster deliver strong automation and provisioning, but Derrick provides deeper enrichment coverage, stricter data quality control, and ongoing value without leaving Sheets.

PhantomBuster and Apollo have different pricing structures making direct comparison challenging. PhantomBuster charges based on automation credits and monthly usage, while Apollo operates on a per-seat model with tiered plans starting around $49 monthly. For most teams, Apollo typically proves cheaper upfront, but PhantomBuster can be more cost-effective at scale depending on your automation volume. However, Derrick App offers a compelling alternative with rollover credits, no credit card required for the free tier, and transparent per-credit pricing starting at just $9 monthly, making it often the most budget-friendly option for teams seeking data enrichment without long-term commitments.

Derrick can replace some workflow needs that PhantomBuster and Apollo address, but not as a complete one-to-one swap for every scenario. Derrick excels as a 100% native Google Sheets enrichment platform with real-time email validation, AI-driven scoring, and extensive Zapier/Make/n8n integrations, all without CSV exports or LinkedIn Navigator dependencies. For tasks centered on large-scale scraping or multi-channel outreach, PhantomBuster or Apollo may still offer strengths in data extraction or extensive contact databases. Derrick complements them by tightening data quality, speed, and cost efficiency within a Google Sheets-centered workflow.