Phantombuster Vs Linkfinder : Comparaison

Whether Derrick is better for teams depends on your workflow priorities. PhantomBuster excels at large-scale web automation and data extraction, making it ideal if you need robust scraping capabilities across multiple platforms. However, Derrick offers distinct advantages for teams already using Google Sheets: it's 100% native to Sheets with no CSV exports, includes AI-powered enrichment with Claude and ChatGPT, provides rollover credits monthly, and requires no credit card for the free tier. If your team values seamless spreadsheet integration and wants to avoid external platforms, Derrick streamlines prospecting workflows more efficiently than PhantomBuster's automation-focused approach.

Derrick can effectively replace both tools depending on your workflow needs. PhantomBuster excels at web automation and large-scale data extraction, while LinkFinder focuses on bulk CSV enrichment. Derrick combines these strengths natively within Google Sheets, eliminating manual CSV imports and exports that both alternatives require. You get 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, and built-in AI scoring without switching between platforms. However, if you need advanced web scraping beyond standard enrichment, PhantomBuster's automation capabilities remain specialized. For most B2B prospecting workflows, Derrick consolidates both functions into one seamless, native spreadsheet experience with rollover credits and no upfront payment required.

Between Derrick App and PhantomBuster, Derrick generally offers better pricing for ongoing, high-volume prospecting needs due to its credits-based model, monthly rollovers, and a no-credit-card-free-tier option. PhantomBuster pricing scales with usage and can become expensive for large outreach or complex automations. Derrick’s 200 free credits and scalable Small to XL plans (with 4,000 to 100,000 credits) provide predictable budgeting, plus native Google Sheets integration and 50+ enrichment attributes, which reduce overhead and CSV-related costs. If you primarily need rapid data enrichment without exporting to CSV, Derrick tends to deliver a more cost-efficient, flexible option.

PhantomBuster excels at web automation and large-scale data extraction, particularly from social platforms, but lacks comprehensive data enrichment capabilities—it's primarily a collection engine requiring manual verification. LinkFinder focuses on endpoint discovery for security research rather than B2B data enrichment, making it unsuitable for sales and marketing workflows. Both require external tools for complete enrichment pipelines. Derrick differentiates by operating natively within Google Sheets, eliminating CSV export friction while offering 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, and integrated AI for automated scoring and segmentation—all without requiring LinkedIn Sales Navigator or complex configurations.

Derrick’s reviews across comparisons consistently highlight its native Google Sheets integration, which eliminates CSV exports and complex setup, making enrichment and outreach feel seamless for teams already using Sheets. In pricing terms, Derrick offers a transparent tiering: a Free plan with 200 credits and monthly rollovers, plus Small, Medium, Large, and XL plans that scale credits (e.g., 9€, 20€, 47.50€, 175€ equivalents) with no credit card required for the free tier. Compared to LinkFinder, Derrick provides broader data enrichment beyond URLs and basic contacts, plus 50+ enrichment attributes per contact or company, real-time email validation, and AI scoring/segmentation. While LinkFinder excels at bulk CSV enrichment without LinkedIn login risk, it lacks native Google Sheets workflow, broader enrichment depth, and the credit-based pricing flexibility Derrick offers. Overall, Derrick positions itself as a more integrated, scalable prospecting platform within Sheets, with flexible credits and native workflow advantages that can justify its pricing for teams seeking end-to-end enrichment without platform switching.