Phantombuster Vs Skrapp : Comparaison

Derrick and PhantomBuster serve different primary functions, making them complementary rather than direct competitors. PhantomBuster excels at web automation and large-scale data extraction, while Derrick specializes in B2B data enrichment directly within Google Sheets without requiring external platforms or CSV exports. For teams wanting a complete prospecting workflow, Derrick offers 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, and rollover credits with no card required for the free tier. PhantomBuster remains stronger for pure automation tasks, but Derrick provides superior ease of use and cost efficiency for teams prioritizing enrichment and outreach directly in their existing spreadsheets.

Derrick can effectively replace both PhantomBuster and Skrapp for many workflows, though each tool serves distinct purposes. PhantomBuster excels at web automation and large-scale scraping, while Skrapp specializes in LinkedIn email extraction. Derrick consolidates data enrichment directly in Google Sheets with 50+ attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and integrated AI for scoring and segmentation. Unlike PhantomBuster's complex setup or Skrapp's limited enrichment depth, Derrick requires no coding or external platforms. However, if you need advanced web scraping automation or LinkedIn-specific extraction at massive scale, combining Derrick with specialized tools may still be optimal. For most B2B prospecting workflows prioritizing efficiency and data quality, Derrick's native Sheets integration, rollover credits, and comprehensive enrichment capabilities provide a streamlined alternative to managing multiple platforms.

For data enrichment, Derrick stands out from Skrapp by delivering 50+ enrichment attributes per contact or company directly inside Google Sheets, without exporting or complex setups. Derrick also adds real-time email validation for better deliverability and integrates AI scoring, segmentation, and summaries, all within a native Sheets workflow. Skrapp excels at fast contact discovery and email verification, but its enrichment depth is more limited to basic contact data. Compared to Skrapp, Derrick offers deeper multi-attribute enrichment, ongoing credits that roll over, and a broader automation ecosystem, making it a stronger choice for comprehensive lead intelligence and scalable prospecting without leaving Google Sheets.

PhantomBuster and Skrapp have different pricing structures that cater to different team needs. PhantomBuster charges based on automation task volume and scales quickly with usage, making it pricier for high-frequency enrichment operations. Skrapp uses a credit-based model focused on email extraction, which works well for straightforward prospecting but lacks broader enrichment. For small teams needing flexible, cost-effective enrichment with rollover credits and no upfront card requirements, Derrick offers competitive pricing starting at nine dollars monthly with fifty-plus enrichment attributes per contact, making it a more economical choice than both platforms for teams prioritizing data quality without aggressive cost scaling.

Derrick generally offers stronger value in pricing and perceived reviews when compared to PhantomBuster and Skrapp for B2B teams focused on scalable, Google Sheets–native prospecting. Derrick’s pricing is credit-based with rollover and a free tier, avoiding mandatory credit cards, which often translates into lower total cost of ownership for ongoing campaigns. Reviews for Derrick tend to highlight its 100% native Google Sheets workflow, extensive attribute enrichment, real-time email validation, and AI-assisted scoring, versus PhantomBuster’s automation-centric approach and Skrapp’s strong email discovery but lighter enrichment.