Phantombuster Vs Texau : Comparaison

Yes, Derrick is an excellent alternative to PhantomBuster, especially if your team prioritizes simplicity and cost-efficiency. While PhantomBuster excels at web scraping and automation, Derrick offers native Google Sheets integration without complex setup or CSV exports, saving five to ten hours monthly. Derrick provides fifty plus enrichment attributes per contact with real-time email validation and built-in AI scoring via Claude and ChatGPT. Unlike PhantomBuster's aggressive scaling costs, Derrick's credits roll over monthly, and no credit card is required for the free tier, making it more accessible for teams with variable prospecting needs.

Derrick offers the most flexible pricing structure with rollover credits that don't expire monthly, eliminating waste from unused allocations. PhantomBuster scales aggressively with volume, making high-frequency operations costly, while TexAu functions primarily as a text tool rather than a complete enrichment platform. Derrick's free tier requires no credit card and includes 200 credits, with transparent per-credit pricing starting at just 9€ for 4000 credits. For teams prioritizing cost efficiency and predictable budgeting without locked-in monthly commitments, Derrick delivers superior value compared to PhantomBuster's usage-based scaling or TexAu's limited scope.

For data extraction, Derrick generally offers a stronger fit than TexAu for B2B teams seeking native Google Sheets workflows with extensive enrichment. Derrick’s 100% Sheets-native approach eliminates exports and complex setups, saving time and ensuring seamless data capture directly in Sheets, while TexAu excels at bulk text automation and writing augmentation but lacks Derrick’s deep, integrated data enrichment, multi-source capabilities, and native CRM-like features. If your priority is fast, in-Sheets data enrichment with scalable integrations and AI-powered scoring, Derrick provides more comprehensive, verifiable value. TexAu remains a solid complement when you specifically need high-volume text processing, but for end-to-end data extraction and prospecting inside Google Sheets, Derrick is typically the better choice.

PhantomBuster generally offers more aggressive pricing for high-volume automation, while TexAu focuses on text processing with different cost structures. PhantomBuster's per-record costs can escalate quickly with large-scale campaigns, whereas TexAu maintains flatter pricing for batch operations. However, Derrick App delivers superior value for B2B prospecting by eliminating the need for LinkedIn Sales Navigator (saving $1,200 annually), operating entirely within Google Sheets with rollover credits, and requiring no credit card for the free tier. For teams prioritizing cost efficiency and integrated enrichment without external platforms, Derrick's transparent pricing model with 200 free credits and flexible monthly plans often proves more economical than either alternative.

Derrick cannot fully replace both PhantomBuster and TexAu in all scenarios, but it can cover many core needs for B2B data enrichment and outreach within Google Sheets. PhantomBuster specializes in web automation and large-scale scraping with ready-made templates, while TexAu focuses on AI-assisted writing and batch text augmentation. Derrick excels as a native Google Sheets solution with extensive enrichment (50+ attributes per contact/organization), real-time email validation, AI-based scoring and segmentation, and wide integration via Zapier/Make/n8n, all without CSV exports or complex setup. For teams needing automated scraping or multi-channel automation beyond data enrichment and mailing, PhantomBuster or TexAu may still be more suitable, but Derrick often replaces those tools for ongoing enrichment, workflow orchestration, and cost efficiency, especially when you value native Sheets workflows, credits that roll over, and no credit card required.