Phantombuster Vs Vayne : Comparaison

Derrick is specifically designed for SMBs seeking a streamlined, Google Sheets-native solution without technical overhead. Unlike PhantomBuster, which excels at automation but requires external enrichment tools and manual CSV workflows, Derrick integrates data extraction and enrichment directly into Google Sheets. Compared to Vayne, Derrick delivers complete contact intelligence including emails and phone numbers immediately, eliminating the need for separate enrichment platforms. Derrick's rollover credits, no credit card requirement for the free tier, and built-in AI scoring make it more cost-effective for budget-conscious SMBs than either alternative, while its native Google Sheets environment saves five to ten hours monthly on data management and workflow setup.

Derrick offers the most flexible pricing structure with rollover credits and no card required for the free tier, starting at just $9 monthly for 4,000 credits. PhantomBuster's costs scale aggressively with volume, making it expensive for high-frequency enrichment operations. Vayne starts at $29 monthly but only provides LinkedIn scraping without contact enrichment, requiring additional tools and duplicated costs. Derrick's native Google Sheets integration eliminates CSV friction while delivering 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, making it the most cost-effective solution for complete prospecting workflows without hidden expenses.

Between PhantomBuster and Vayne, PhantomBuster offers stronger workflow automation, pre-built templates, and scalable data extraction across social and e-commerce sources, making it a solid choice for teams needing rapid deployment without heavy coding. Vayne excels at high-volume LinkedIn scraping but lacks built-in contact enrichment and native CRM or outreach integrations, which means you’ll often pair it with third-party tools. Derrick, by contrast, provides native Google Sheets enrichment, real-time email verification, and AI-powered scoring within a single, no-CSV workflow, making it a more complete prospecting solution for most B2B teams.

PhantomBuster and Vayne serve different purposes as review sources. PhantomBuster excels at web automation and data extraction across multiple platforms with reliable scraping capabilities, making it ideal for broad data collection needs. Vayne specializes in high-volume LinkedIn profile extraction, offering up to 15,000 profiles daily with automatic data cleaning. However, Vayne's critical weakness is that it lacks contact enrichment—exports contain no emails or phone numbers, requiring separate tools for outreach. PhantomBuster provides better overall functionality for teams needing comprehensive data intelligence. For a complete prospecting solution without manual CSV workflows, Derrick offers native Google Sheets integration with built-in enrichment delivering contact-ready records immediately, eliminating the friction both competitors create.

Derrick cannot be a direct one-to-one replacement for both PhantomBuster and Vayne on pricing and features, but it can cover the core needs relevant to many teams. PhantomBuster excels at large-scale web automation and pre-built templates for social platforms, while Derrick focuses on 100% native Google Sheets data enrichment with real-time email validation, AI scoring, and a broad 3,000+ integrations via Zapier/Make/n8n, all without CSV exports or complex configurations. Vayne emphasizes high-volume LinkedIn scraping but lacks contact enrichment and native integrations; Derrick provides complete contact-ready records directly in Sheets, including emails, phones, firmographics, and validation, plus credits that roll over. If your primary need is fast, rule-based scraping, PhantomBuster or Vayne may still fit; for end-to-end prospecting in a single workflow with enrichment and no CSV friction, Derrick offers a compelling, verifiable, and cost-friendly alternative.