Phantombuster Vs Waalaxy : Comparaison

Yes, Derrick is an excellent alternative to PhantomBuster for automation, especially if you prioritize simplicity and cost efficiency. While PhantomBuster excels at large-scale web scraping and workflow automation, Derrick offers a more streamlined approach by operating natively within Google Sheets without requiring complex setup or CSV exports. Derrick provides real-time email validation, 50+ enrichment attributes, and integrated AI capabilities with Claude and ChatGPT for intelligent segmentation and scoring. Unlike PhantomBuster's steep learning curve for advanced workflows, Derrick requires minimal technical knowledge. Additionally, Derrick's monthly rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier make it more cost-effective for teams with variable automation needs, while PhantomBuster's pricing scales aggressively with volume.

Derrick and Waalaxy serve different prospecting needs. Waalaxy excels at LinkedIn automation and outreach sequencing, making it ideal for teams focused on connection requests and message campaigns. However, Derrick outperforms for data enrichment and prospect intelligence, offering 50+ attributes per contact with real-time email validation directly in Google Sheets. Derrick requires no LinkedIn Sales Navigator subscription, saving teams $1,200 annually, while providing integrated AI scoring and seamless CRM syncing through 3,000+ app integrations. For comprehensive prospecting combining enrichment with outreach, Derrick delivers superior data depth and cost efficiency without complex setup.

For use cases, Derrick shines as a native Google Sheets enrichment and prospecting hub, while PhantomBuster excels at automated data extraction and broad workflow automation, and Waalaxy focuses on LinkedIn-driven outreach and multi-channel prospecting. Derrick offers 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, AI-powered scoring and segmentation, and seamless 3,000+ integrations via Zapier/Make/n8n, all without exporting to CSV or using LinkedIn Navigator. PhantomBuster is strong for large-scale scraping and template-driven automation but may require external enrichment for deeper insights. Waalaxy delivers fast LinkedIn-centric outreach and CRM integration but can lack depth in data enrichment. If your priority is deep, scalable prospect intelligence directly in Sheets with zero CSV exports and flexible credits, Derrick provides a measurable edge.

PhantomBuster's pricing structure scales aggressively with volume, making per-record enrichment expensive for high-frequency campaigns, particularly when running large-scale operations simultaneously. Waalaxy similarly charges based on usage, with costs rising quickly for teams managing multiple outreach sequences. Derrick offers a more transparent, credit-based pricing model starting at just nine dollars monthly for four thousand credits with rollover flexibility, meaning unused credits carry forward. Unlike PhantomBuster and Waalaxy which require separate tools for enrichment depth, Derrick combines data enrichment with fifty plus contact attributes directly within Google Sheets, eliminating costly third-party integrations and reducing your overall prospecting stack expenses.

Yes, Derrick can replace some of PhantomBuster and Waalaxy for data enrichment, but with nuances. Derrick is 100% native to Google Sheets, enabling rich enrichment across 50+ attributes per contact or company and real-time email validation, all without scraping or LinkedIn dependencies. PhantomBuster excels at large-scale automation and data extraction, while Waalaxy focuses on LinkedIn-based outreach. Derrick complements or supersedes basic enrichment and data quality within a practical, sheet-driven workflow, especially for teams valuing seamless integrations, AI scoring, and cost efficiency. However, for heavy multi-source scraping or advanced LinkedIn automation, you may still need specialized tools.