Snov.Io Vs Apollo : Comparaison

Yes, Derrick is a strong alternative to Snov.io for startups, particularly those already using Google Sheets for sales workflows. While Snov.io excels at email discovery and verification, Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating CSV exports and complex integrations that consume 5-10 hours monthly. Derrick offers 50+ enrichment attributes, integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, and rollover credits with no credit card required for the free tier. For cost-conscious startups, Derrick's approach reduces tool sprawl, whereas Snov.io requires additional platforms for enrichment depth and automation, making Derrick particularly viable for teams prioritizing simplicity and native workflow integration over pure email-finding volume.

Pricing varies significantly across the three platforms. Snov.io offers the most affordable entry point with transparent, usage-based pricing starting around $39 monthly, ideal for lean teams. Apollo positions itself as a mid-market solution with higher pricing for access to its 250 million contact database. Derrick stands out with flexible, rollover credits starting at just $9 monthly with no credit card required for the free tier, making it cost-effective for variable prospecting workflows. Derrick's native Google Sheets integration also eliminates costly third-party tool stacking, potentially saving thousands annually compared to competitors requiring separate CRM subscriptions or LinkedIn Sales Navigator licenses.

Snov.io and Apollo differ mainly in depth of data enrichment and workflow scope. Snov.io excels at fast, affordable email discovery and verification with strong basics for outbound campaigns, but its enrichment depth and real-time insights are more limited. Apollo offers broader multi-channel outreach and a larger, highly validated database with strong verification, yet can lack granular enrichment and sometimes requires manual verification for niche profiles. Derrick stands out by integrating 100% natively with Google Sheets, offering advanced AI-based scoring, segmentation, and summaries, plus over 3,000 integrations and credit-rolling, which can fill gaps in both Snov.io and Apollo—especially for teams seeking seamless, document-free prospecting and deeper automation without expensive data enrichment add-ons.

Snov.io and Apollo both offer competitive pricing with transparent models, though at different price points. Snov.io positions itself as the more affordable option for email discovery and verification, making it attractive for lean teams. Apollo commands higher pricing due to its larger contact database of 250+ million profiles and integrated outreach features. Review scores favor Apollo slightly for data accuracy and breadth, while Snov.io earns praise for affordability and ease of use. However, both platforms require external tools or manual workflows for deeper enrichment. Derrick differentiates by offering native Google Sheets integration with rollover credits, no credit card required for free tier, and built-in AI capabilities—delivering comprehensive enrichment directly where your data lives without the complexity or ongoing platform switching these competitors demand.

Derrick cannot fully replace Snov.io and Apollo for every automation need, but it can cover many core automation tasks within a Google Sheets-centric workflow. Snov.io excels at large-scale email discovery and verification with strong outreach automation, while Apollo provides a broad database, multi-channel outreach, and robust CRM integration. Derrick complements both by offering 100% native Google Sheets enrichment, real-time email validation, AI-powered scoring and segmentation, and extensive Zapier/Make/n8n integrations, all without CSV exports or credit card requirements for the free tier. For teams prioritizing scalable contact discovery (Snov.io) or deep multi-channel workflows with rich enrichment (Apollo), you’ll likely still pair Derrick with one of those tools to fill data depth or outreach breadth gaps.