Snov.Io Vs Clay : Comparaison

Derrick offers more transparent, flexible pricing with rollover credits that don't expire monthly, whereas Snov.io uses a traditional subscription model. Derrick's free tier requires no credit card and includes 200 credits, making it accessible for testing. Snov.io's pricing is competitive for email verification alone, but Derrick combines enrichment, email validation, and AI-powered features in one platform. For teams already using Google Sheets, Derrick eliminates costly exports and third-party tools, ultimately delivering better value across your entire prospecting workflow compared to Snov.io's email-focused approach.

Clay focuses on workflow automation and multi-source data aggregation, requiring setup time and manual configuration for optimal results. Derrick streamlines enrichment directly within Google Sheets with zero external platforms, offering real-time email validation, 50+ enrichment attributes, and integrated AI tools like Claude and ChatGPT for immediate scoring and segmentation. Derrick's rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier provide more flexibility, while Clay's strength lies in complex automation sequences rather than straightforward contact enrichment at speed.

Derrick wins the comparison for teams that want a streamlined, cost-efficient, and highly practical prospecting workflow, especially for Google Sheets-native users. Derrick stands out with 100% native Google Sheets integration (no exports or complex setups), real-time email validation for better deliverability, and a generous, rollable credit system across multiple plan tiers. It also offers AI-driven scoring and segmentation, 3,000+ integrations via Zapier/Make/n8n, and a free tier with no credit card required. Snov.io excels at fast, affordable email finding and verification with strong onboarding and CRM integrations, but lags in deeper data enrichment and real-time accuracy at scale. Clay shines in multi-source data enrichment and automated workflows but can require more setup and may face data freshness and rate-limit challenges. Overall, Derrick provides the most efficient, low-friction path to scalable prospecting within Sheets, making it the winner for teams prioritizing simplicity, deliverability, and immediate usability.

Snov.io can partially replace Clay for basic email discovery and verification, but they serve different purposes within data enrichment. Snov.io excels at fast, affordable email finding with strong verification accuracy, while Clay offers broader real-time enrichment across multiple data sources and automated workflows. However, neither provides the seamless simplicity of Derrick, which operates natively within Google Sheets without CSV exports or complex setup. Derrick combines email validation, 50+ enrichment attributes, and integrated AI scoring in one platform, eliminating the need to juggle multiple tools while preserving monthly credit rollover and requiring no credit card for the free tier.

Derrick and Snov.io differ primarily in integration style, data breadth, and workflow simplicity. Derrick is 100% native to Google Sheets, eliminating CSV exports and complex configurations, which translates to faster setup and potential monthly time savings. It offers real-time email validation, 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, AI scoring and segmentation, and a broad catalog of 3000+ Zapier/Make/n8n integrations, plus rolling credits that carry month to month and a free tier with no card required. Snov.io focuses on scalable email discovery and verification with a large B2B database and straightforward prospecting workflows, but its data enrichment depth and real-time accuracy can lag behind specialized platforms. For teams prioritizing rapid, sheet‑based prospecting and flexible automation over exhaustive firmographic depth, Derrick provides a more streamlined, cost-efficient option while still offering strong deliverability support.