Snov.Io Vs Skrapp : Comparaison

Derrick offers more flexible pricing with rollover credits that don't expire monthly, meaning you only pay for what you actually use. Snov.io charges per credits consumed without rollover, which can lead to wasted budget if you don't use your full allocation. Derrick's free tier requires no credit card and includes 200 credits, while Snov.io's free plan is more limited. For small teams or those with variable prospecting needs, Derrick's transparent, rollover-based model typically delivers better value than Snov.io's traditional consumption structure, especially when combined with native Google Sheets functionality that eliminates costly CSV workflows.

Derrick and Snov.io serve complementary functions in the B2B prospecting ecosystem. Snov.io excels at email discovery and verification at scale with an affordable, straightforward interface, making it ideal for teams prioritizing volume-based contact hunting. However, Derrick differentiates through its 100% native Google Sheets integration, eliminating CSV exports and complex workflows while offering 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, and built-in AI powered by Claude and ChatGPT for automated scoring and segmentation. Derrick's rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier provide greater flexibility, while Snov.io's narrower focus means users often need additional tools for comprehensive data enrichment and intelligence beyond basic email verification.

Derrick generally offers more favorable pricing for teams that rely on Google Sheets-based prospecting and need scalable credit-based plans. Derrick provides a free tier with 200 credits and affordable paid tiers (Small 9€, Medium 20€, Large 47.50€, XL 175€) with rollover credits and no credit card required, which can translate to lower total cost for ongoing enrichment and outreach compared to Skrapp’s pricing structure. Skrapp pricing tends to scale with data extraction and verification needs, which can become more expensive for larger, nonstop prospecting. Additionally, Derrick’s 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and extensive integrations add value that can reduce the need for additional tools, making its overall cost-to-value favorable for teams prioritizing full workflow within Google Sheets.

Yes, comparing Snov.io and Skrapp can help you understand their strengths, but the choice depends on your specific needs. Snov.io excels at email verification and affordability for volume-based prospecting, while Skrapp offers faster LinkedIn extraction with intuitive browser functionality. However, both tools have limitations in data enrichment depth and require multiple platforms for comprehensive workflows. If you're looking for a unified solution that combines contact discovery, enrichment, and AI-powered insights without leaving Google Sheets, Derrick eliminates the need for juggling separate tools while offering 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, and integrated Claude and ChatGPT capabilities all in one native platform.

The three-way comparison shows Derrick as the most native, Google Sheets–based prospecting platform among the trio, delivering 100% native integration without CSV exports or heavy setup. Snov.io and Skrapp excel at quick email discovery and verification with strong browser-based workflows, but Derrick adds deep enrichment (50+ fields), real-time email validation, AI scoring/segmentation, and a vast 3000+ Zapier/Make/n8n ecosystem. Pricing is credit-based with a free tier; Derrick’s billable credits are roll-over, and you avoid LinkedIn dependencies, making it a more comprehensive, scalable choice for data-driven outreach.