Voilanorbert Vs Clay : Comparaison

Derrick and VoilaNorbert serve different prospecting needs. VoilaNorbert excels as a dedicated email finder with strong accuracy rates, but it only returns email addresses without context like job titles, company data, or phone numbers. Derrick provides comprehensive B2B enrichment with 50+ attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring—all natively within Google Sheets without CSV exports or complex setup. If you need just email verification, VoilaNorbert works well. If you want complete prospect intelligence with automation and personalization data for better outreach performance, Derrick's unified approach eliminates tool fragmentation and manual research overhead.

Derrick operates as a native Google Sheets platform, eliminating the need for CSV exports or external tools that VoilaNorbert requires. While VoilaNorbert specializes purely in email verification with high accuracy, Derrick provides 50+ enrichment attributes per contact including emails, phone numbers, job titles, and company data in one unified interface. Pricing-wise, Derrick starts free with 200 credits and rollover unused credits monthly, whereas VoilaNorbert uses monthly allocations that expire. For teams wanting comprehensive prospect intelligence beyond email-only data, Derrick's integrated AI scoring and direct Google Sheets workflow saves significant setup time compared to VoilaNorbert's supplementary tool requirements.

Between VoilaNorbert and Clay, pricing strength depends on how you measure value. VoilaNorbert typically charges per email search with monthly credits that can add up quickly for large volumes, while Clay bundles data enrichment with outbound automation and may require more setup time, potentially leading to higher total costs for complex campaigns. Derrick, by contrast, uses a credit-based model with a transparent tiered structure (Free 200 credits, Small 4000, Medium 10000, Large 25000, XL 100000) and emphasizes 100% native Google Sheets, over 50 enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and credits rollovers. For teams aiming for cost efficiency at scale and seamless, no-export workflow, Derrick often delivers stronger pricing value, especially since you can avoid CSV exports and additional tools, while VoilaNorbert and Clay can incur higher ongoing costs when pursuing broader enrichment or automation needs.

VoilaNorbert and Clay each serve different prospecting needs with distinct trade-offs. VoilaNorbert excels at pure email verification with industry-leading accuracy above 95%, making it ideal for teams prioritizing speed and email-only enrichment. Clay offers broader data aggregation across 50+ sources with workflow automation, but requires more setup time and faces occasional accuracy inconsistencies. For teams wanting comprehensive enrichment without complexity, Derrick provides 50+ contact attributes, real-time email validation, integrated AI scoring, and rollover credits—all natively in Google Sheets with no CSV exports or technical configuration required, delivering better value for streamlined prospecting workflows.

Derrick cannot be a direct one-to-one replacement for both VoilaNorbert and Clay for all enrichment needs, but it can cover the core discovery and enrichment you require within a single, native Google Sheets workflow. VoilaNorbert excels at fast email discovery and verification, while Clay emphasizes multi-source data enrichment and workflow automation. Derrick combines extensive data enrichment (50+ attributes per contact or company), real-time email validation, and AI-powered scoring, all inside Google Sheets with 3,000+ integrations via Zapier/Make/n8n, plus transferable credits and no credit card required for the free tier. If your priority is a streamlined, cost-effective, sheet-native enrichment and outreach setup, Derrick can replace multiple tools for many use cases, though ultra-niche or highly specialized enrichment needs might still benefit from dedicated providers for certain data sources.