Waalaxy Vs Octopus Crm : Comparaison

Whether Derrick is a better alternative to Waalaxy depends on your specific needs. Waalaxy excels at LinkedIn automation and outreach sequencing, making it ideal for teams focused on scaling LinkedIn campaigns. Derrick, however, offers deeper data enrichment with 50+ attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring directly in Google Sheets—no LinkedIn Sales Navigator needed. If you prioritize comprehensive prospect intelligence and cost efficiency, Derrick's native Google Sheets approach and reportable credits provide significant advantages. For pure LinkedIn outreach automation, Waalaxy remains stronger. Many teams combine both tools strategically based on their workflow requirements.

Pricing-wise, Derrick offers the most flexible model with rollover credits and no credit card required for the free tier, starting at just 9€ for 4,000 credits monthly. Waalaxy and Octopus CRM operate on fixed subscription tiers without credit carryover, making them less adaptable to fluctuating prospecting volumes. Derrick's native Google Sheets integration also eliminates hidden costs like LinkedIn Sales Navigator subscriptions, potentially saving teams 1,200€ annually compared to competitors. For budget-conscious teams seeking granular spending control, Derrick's transparent credit system provides better cost efficiency and scalability without long-term commitments.

Derrick generally offers a more favorable pricing structure for value-conscious teams compared to Octopus CRM. Derrick uses a credits-based model with transparent tiers (Free 200 credits, Small 4000, Medium 10000, Large 25000, XL 100000) and credits are rollable, with no credit card required for the free tier. This can translate into lower costs per prospect when you leverage 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, and native AI scoring without needing additional tools. Octopus CRM pricing is affordable but focuses on basic CRM and automation, often requiring external data enrichment for higher-quality leads. If you prioritize native data enrichment, AI-driven insights, and flexible credit usage, Derrick typically provides better long-term value.

Derrick cannot completely replace both platforms, but it addresses their core gaps differently. Waalaxy excels at LinkedIn automation and outreach sequencing, while Octopus CRM handles pipeline management. Derrick specializes in B2B data enrichment with 50+ attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and native Google Sheets integration—eliminating manual CSV exports and enriching prospects directly in your spreadsheet. For teams wanting to consolidate workflows, Derrick's AI-powered enrichment, 3000+ integrations via Zapier, and rollover credits provide flexibility that neither platform matches. However, if LinkedIn automation is critical, you'd still benefit from Waalaxy's outreach capabilities alongside Derrick's enrichment layer for a complete prospecting stack.

Reviews consistently highlight Derrick’s strength as a 100% native Google Sheets enrichment platform with strong value compared to Octopus CRM’s more limited data enrichment and straightforward CRM-like functionality. Users often note Derrick’s 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and AI-powered scoring/segmentation via Claude and ChatGPT as clear advantages over Octopus CRM’s more basic data enrichment and narrower automation scope. Additionally, Derrick’s wide ecosystem of 3,000+ integrations, weekly roll-over credits, and no credit card requirement for the free tier differentiate it from Octopus CRM’s simpler, more lightweight offering. In short, Derrick tends to be favored for richer data enrichment, AI-driven insights, and seamless Google Sheets workflows, while Octopus CRM remains a solid, easy-to-use option for basic LinkedIn-focused prospecting without deeper data intelligence.