Zoominfo Vs Kaspr : Comparaison

Yes, Derrick is an excellent alternative to ZoomInfo for outreach, particularly if you prioritize ease of use and cost efficiency. While ZoomInfo excels as a comprehensive B2B database, it requires complex setup and carries higher enterprise pricing. Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating CSV exports and technical friction, and enriches contacts with 50+ attributes including real-time email validation. You'll save 5-10 hours monthly on data management and avoid ZoomInfo's steep learning curve. For teams seeking streamlined, affordable outreach automation without sacrificing data quality, Derrick delivers faster time-to-value with rollover credits and no upfront commitment required.

Derrick and Kaspr serve different prospecting needs with distinct advantages. Kaspr focuses primarily on LinkedIn-based contact verification and phone number accuracy, excelling at quick lead qualification through its Chrome extension. Derrick, however, operates as a native Google Sheets platform offering 50+ enrichment attributes per contact and company, integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, plus real-time email validation. Pricing-wise, Derrick's rollover credits and free tier without requiring a credit card provide greater flexibility than Kaspr's credit-based model. For teams needing comprehensive data enrichment beyond contact-level information, Derrick delivers deeper firmographic and intent-driven intelligence directly within your existing workflow.

Derrick App, ZoomInfo, and Kaspr each target different facets of pricing and reviews. ZoomInfo tends to be higher-priced with enterprise-focused plans, strong data quality, and broad coverage, but users note a steeper learning curve and potential data overlap. Kaspr offers transparent, credit-based pricing and solid LinkedIn-driven prospecting, with consistently positive reviews for speed and accuracy at contact level, yet limited enrichment depth. Derrick differentiates on native Google Sheets operation, credits that roll over, 50+ enrichment attributes, and real-time email validation, often highlighted for saving time and avoiding complex setups. Overall, Derrick tends to be more cost-flexible for teams prioritizing ease of use and outbound efficiency.

Derrick offers significantly more flexible pricing than Kaspr with rollover credits that don't expire monthly, meaning you only pay for what you actually use. Kaspr operates on a credit-based model but lacks this flexibility. Derrick's free tier requires no credit card and provides 200 credits to start, while Kaspr typically requires payment upfront. For budget-conscious teams, Derrick's transparent tiering from 9€ monthly for 4000 credits provides better value, especially since unused credits carry forward. Kaspr's pricing structure can become costly at scale without the same rollover benefits, making Derrick the more economical choice for variable prospecting workflows.

Derrick cannot fully replace both ZoomInfo and Kaspr for all prospects and enrichment scenarios, but it can complement them in meaningful ways. ZoomInfo excels at broad, scalable data enrichment and company-level insights, while Kaspr shines in real-time contact verification and LinkedIn-based prospecting. Derrick adds depth with 50+ enrichment attributes per contact or company, real-time email validation for deliverability, AI-driven scoring and segmentation, and seamless native Google Sheets workflows without CSV exports. If you rely on extensive firmographic/technographic data and broad market coverage, you’ll still benefit from ZoomInfo. If your priority is rapid contact-level enrichment and LinkedIn-derived prospects, Kaspr remains valuable. Derrick can augment both by enriching profiles, validating emails, and enabling scalable outreach within Sheets, offering cost-effective credits and flexible automation.